Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[lldb][cherry-pick] Various fixes to definition DIE parsing #9788

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: swift/release/6.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Michael137
Copy link

The last two commits address bugs related to the lazy definition DIE parsing (in the presence of debug-maps). The remaining commits are NFC cleanups around the area.

rdar://141002517

llvm#120218)

With all the recent versions of Clang that I tested, ObjC forward
declarations like
```
@Class ForwardObjcClass;
```
don't emit the kind of DWARF that this workaround was put in place for.

Also, zero-sized structures are valid in C (and thus Objective-C), so
this workaround makes things confusing to reason about when mixing the
two languages.

This workaround has been in place for at least a decade, and given that
recent compilers don't produce this anymore, we think it's a good time
to remove it.

(cherry picked from commit 794cd81)
The `llvm-gcc` front-end has been EOL'd at least since 2011 (based on
some `git` archeology). And Clang/LLVM has been removing references to
it ever since.

This patch removes the remaining references to it from LLDB. One benefit
of this is that it will allow us to remove the code checking for
`DW_AT_decl_file_attributes_are_invalid` and
`Supports_DW_AT_APPLE_objc_complete_type`.

(cherry picked from commit e0a79ee)
…lete_type and DW_AT_decl_file_attributes_are_invalid (llvm#120226)

Depends on llvm#120225

With `llvm-gcc` support being removed from LLDB, these APIs
are now trivial and can be removed too.

(cherry picked from commit f176388)
…ecordType (llvm#120456)

Became unused since the recent
llvm#110648

(cherry picked from commit 6fd267d)
…ymbolFileDWARFDebugMap (llvm#120569)

The problem here manifests as follows:
1. We are stopped in main.o, so the first `ParseTypeFromDWARF` on
`FooImpl<char>` gets called on `main.o`'s SymbolFile. This adds a
mapping from *declaration die* -> `TypeSP` into `main.o`'s
`GetDIEToType` map.
2. We then `CompleteType(FooImpl<char>)`. Depending on the order of
entries in the debug-map, this might call `CompleteType` on `lib.o`'s
SymbolFile. In which case, `GetDIEToType().lookup(decl_die)` will return
a `nullptr`. This is already a bit iffy because some of the surrounding
code assumes we don't call `CompleteTypeFromDWARF` with a `nullptr`
`Type*`. E.g., `CompleteEnumType` blindly dereferences it (though enums
will never encounter this because their definition is fetched in
ParseEnum, unlike for structures).
3. While in `CompleteTypeFromDWARF`, we call `ParseTypeFromDWARF` again.
This will parse the member function `FooImpl::Create` and its return
type which is a typedef to `FooImpl*`. But now we're inside `lib.o`'s
SymbolFile, so we call it on the definition DIE. In step (2) we just
inserted a `nullptr` into `GetDIEToType` for the definition DIE, so we
trivially return a `nullptr` from `ParseTypeFromDWARF`. Instead of
reporting back this parse failure to the user LLDB trucks on and marks
`FooImpl::Ref` to be `void*`.

This test-case will trigger an assert in `TypeSystemClang::VerifyDecl`
even if we just `frame var` (but only in debug-builds). In release
builds where this function is a no-op, we'll create an incorrect Clang
AST node for the `Ref` typedef.

The proposed fix here is to share the `GetDIEToType` map between
SymbolFiles if a debug-map exists.

**Alternatives considered**
* Check the `GetDIEToType` map of the `SymbolFile` that the declaration
DIE belongs to. The assumption here being that if we called
`ParseTypeFromDWARF` on a declaration, the `GetDIEToType` map that the
result was inserted into was the one on that DIE's SymbolFile. This was
the first version of this patch, but that felt like a weaker version
sharing the map. It complicates the code in `CompleteType` and is less
consistent with the other bookkeeping structures we already share
between SymbolFiles
* Return from `SymbolFileDWARF::CompleteType` if there is no type in the
current `GetDIEToType`. Then `SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap::CompleteType`
could continue to the next `SymbolFile` which does own the type. But
that didn't quite work because we remove the
`GetForwardCompilerTypeToDie` entry in `SymbolFile::CompleteType`, which
`SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap::CompleteType` relies upon for iterating

(cherry picked from commit 28d1490)
…queDWARFASTTypeList in C++ (llvm#120809)

This addresses an issue encountered when investigating
llvm#120569.

In `ParseTypeFromDWARF`, we insert the parsed type into
`UniqueDWARFASTTypeMap` using the typename and `Declaration` obtained
with `GetUniqueTypeNameAndDeclaration`. For C++
`GetUniqueTypeNameAndDeclaration` will zero the `Declaration` info
(presumably because forward declaration may not have it, and for C++,
ODR means we can rely on fully qualified typenames for uniqueing). When
we then called `CompleteType`, we would first `MapDeclDIEToDefDIE`,
updating the `UniqueDWARFASTType` we inserted previously with the
`Declaration` of the definition DIE (without zeroing it). We would then
call into `ParseTypeFromDWARF` for the same type again, and search the
`UniqueDWARFASTTypeMap`. But we do the search using a zeroed declaration
we get from `GetUniqueTypeNameAndDeclaration`.

This particular example was fixed by
llvm#120569 but this still feels a
little inconsistent. I'm not entirely sure we can get into that
situation after that patch anymore. So the only test-case I could come
up with was the unit-test which calls `MapDeclDIEToDefDIE` directly.

(cherry picked from commit c660b28)
@Michael137 Michael137 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2024 14:16
@Michael137
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant