test: Replace django mptt with django tree queries for tests

[kwongtn]

Description

As mentioned here, django-mptt is no longer supported.

This PR removes all references to django-mptt (and hence mptt in general) and replace it with treenode (or TreeNode, depending on context).

Should not have any effect on other code.

Merge the following first:

• Update test scope to include django 5.1, update pre-commit hooks #683

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Checklist

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

Summary by Sourcery

Replace django-mptt with tree_queries.

Enhancements:

• Use TreeNode instead of MPTT.

Tests:

• Update tests to use TreeNode.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR removes django-mptt and replaces it with treenode for enhanced performance and maintainability. The changes are primarily focused on updating model definitions, type annotations, and tests to reflect this shift.

Class diagram showing the transition from MPTT to TreeNode

classDiagram
    class MPTTModel {
        <<removed>>
        +parent
        +level
        +tree_id
        +lft
        +rght
    }

    class TreeNodeModel {
        <<added>>
        +parent
        +path
        +depth
        +ordering
    }

    note for TreeNodeModel "Replacement for MPTT implementation"
    MPTTModel <|-- TreeNodeModel : replaces

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replaced MPTT models and types with TreeNode equivalents.	Updated model definitions to use TreeNode instead of MPTT. Updated type annotations to reflect the model changes. Refactored tests to use TreeNode-based models and connections. Renamed files and directories to match the new naming convention.	tests/relay/mptt/models.py tests/relay/treenode/models.py tests/relay/mptt/a.py tests/relay/treenode/a.py tests/relay/mptt/b.py tests/relay/treenode/b.py tests/relay/mptt/test_nested_children.py tests/relay/treenode/test_nested_children.py tests/relay/mptt/test_lazy_annotations.py tests/relay/treenode/test_lazy_annotations.py tests/relay/mptt/snapshots/test_lazy_annotations/test_lazy_type_annotations_in_schema/authors_and_books_schema.gql tests/relay/treenode/snapshots/test_lazy_annotations/test_lazy_type_annotations_in_schema/authors_and_books_schema.gql
Removed django-mptt dependency.	Removed django-mptt from pyproject.toml and poetry.lock files.	pyproject.toml poetry.lock

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.00%. Comparing base (d55d956) to head (82e0f1d).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #684   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.00%   89.00%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        3821     3821           
=======================================
  Hits         3401     3401           
  Misses        420      420           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bellini666]

#683 got merged, can you rebase?

[kwongtn]

@bellini666 done 😁

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @kwongtn - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[bellini666]

Noice! ❤️