Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Traits for bounds checking #383

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Traits for bounds checking #383

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Tokazama
Copy link
Member

Replace PR #321

This is based predominantly on the work by @timholy in JuliaLang/julia#42029. The plan is to work this into ArrayInterface.jl in another PR, replacing some of #291 and taking advantage of the recent function-index where we know everything is inbounds.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #383 (ca7ba96) into master (425e4b3) will increase coverage by 10.24%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #383       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   67.42%   77.67%   +10.24%     
===========================================
  Files           7        7               
  Lines         525      533        +8     
===========================================
+ Hits          354      414       +60     
+ Misses        171      119       -52     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ArrayInterface.jl 78.47% <0.00%> (+17.38%) ⬆️
ext/ArrayInterfaceStaticArraysCoreExt.jl 93.33% <0.00%> (+5.83%) ⬆️
ext/ArrayInterfaceTrackerExt.jl 40.00% <0.00%> (+40.00%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Add a docs section on this?

@Tokazama
Copy link
Member Author

Tokazama commented Mar 4, 2023

I added the doc strings to "index.md" but I should mention there's still not a formal pipeline in place for using these traits yet.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

rebase this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants