LD06/LD19 measured distance stability improvement #28994
+40
−24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It seems to solve the same issue and I see also some parts of code from RPLidar too. I just started looking into the code just because my LD19 was going crazy. IMO description is a little missleading, as basically it updates same face multiple times with latest 12 measurements (2deg slice I think would be for default rotation speed only), but still whole 360deg scanning field is handled. Result is that measured distance varies a lot. |
…m RPLidar driver. Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <[email protected]>
boa-pe
force-pushed
the
lidar360/ld06_ld19_fix
branch
from
0e4cc48 to
f1d7371
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix for Lidar measured distance fluctuations by little transplant from RPLidar driver.
So far tested only on desk with LD19. Test flight as soon as weather is good enough.