Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Hello @vanshg, firstly thank you for opening this discussion. You're correct! CameraX indeed uses minSdk 21. I'm going to check if everything is ok with it and I'll release a new version ASAP. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@ujizin Sounds good! Thank you for looking into it 🙂 P.S. I love this library. It has made camera integration a breeze |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hey @vanshg, the new version Happy new year! 🎉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'd like to use this on an application that has a minSdk of 21. CameraX supports API level 21. I'm currently overriding the library by adding
<uses-sdk tools:overrideLibrary="com.ujizin.camposer"/>
in my Manifest and am able to run a proof of concept without any obvious/glaring issues.What features require the minSdk of 23? Can the usage of those features be checked for explicitly and the minSdk of the library be reduced to 21?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions