You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an issue specifically for tracking relatively small additions, such as convenience functions, forms, etc. If you feel that a certain nicety is currently missing in Rhombus, please raise it; if you feel like implementing one of them, go ahead! If you have a proposal for more systematic change, though, open a separate issue so that it’s easier to track it.
The current list:
Reducer
Equivalents for for/first, for/last, etc.
Right fold, i.e., for/foldr
Sequence
Range with a decreasing step (or any step at all), cf. in-range (implemented, as Range.step_by)
Function
Canonical way to do function composition? Say, operators like <</>> (implemented, as compose and compose_values)
This is an issue specifically for tracking relatively small additions, such as convenience functions, forms, etc. If you feel that a certain nicety is currently missing in Rhombus, please raise it; if you feel like implementing one of them, go ahead! If you have a proposal for more systematic change, though, open a separate issue so that it’s easier to track it.
The current list:
for/first
,for/last
, etc.for/foldr
in-range
(implemented, asRange.step_by
)<<
/>>
(implemented, ascompose
andcompose_values
)|>
)rhombus-compat
&>
for chainingmaybe
results? (implemented, as?>
)!>
for chaining imperative functions?fancy-app
?satisfying
, likeconverting
, but for predicate annotationsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: