You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The torchmetrics.MeanAveragePrecision module now supports the faster-coco-eval backend, which is significantly faster than the default pycocotools backend.
Performance Summary for 5000 Images:
Metric
faster-coco-eval (s)
pycocotools (s)
Speedup (×)
bbox
5.812
22.72
3.91×
segm
7.413
24.434
3.30×
Describe the solution you'd like to propose
Support for configurable backends should be added to the relevant recipes, allowing users to choose between faster-coco-eval and pycocotools.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Continuing with the default pycocotools backend despite its slower performance.
Using a custom integration for faster-coco-eval outside of recipes.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The
torchmetrics.MeanAveragePrecision
module now supports thefaster-coco-eval
backend, which is significantly faster than the defaultpycocotools
backend.Performance Summary for 5000 Images:
faster-coco-eval
(s)pycocotools
(s)Describe the solution you'd like to propose
Support for configurable backends should be added to the relevant recipes, allowing users to choose between
faster-coco-eval
andpycocotools
.Describe alternatives you've considered
pycocotools
backend despite its slower performance.faster-coco-eval
outside of recipes.Additional Context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: