Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is vad necessary? #6

Open
NemoCpp opened this issue Jun 4, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Is vad necessary? #6

NemoCpp opened this issue Jun 4, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@NemoCpp
Copy link

NemoCpp commented Jun 4, 2018

Hi Yuji Tokozume and other authors,
I'd like to try your algorithm on my own dataset for audio classification.
I have quickly read your code, and notice that it seems there is no VAD (voice active detection) processing.
For my own dataset, the audio contains many silence parts.
So, I'd like to ask, is vad necessary for your algorithm or not ?

@Tokozume
Copy link
Member

Tokozume commented Jun 4, 2018

Hi, thank you for your question.
Our algorithm can work without using VAD as well as the standard learning, but we recommend you to use VAD if there are many silent parts in the dataset. We didn't use VAD, because there are not many silent parts in the datasets we used and VAD is not generally used in other papers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants