You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some crates like emath, we can see what some small functions are #[inline] and some #[inline(always)]. Why we cant make all small functions #[inline(always)]?? In some places in code #[inline(always)] may be better what #[inline]. Can anyone make big code review for all crates and specify inline correctly, or tell why in some places where one line of code we use #[inline] instead of #[inline(always)]?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reviewed and updated inline attributes for small functions in the emath crate, changing some #[inline] to #[inline(always)] where appropriate to potentially improve performance.
[!CAUTION]
Disclaimer: The concept of solution was created by AI and you should never copy paste this code before you check the correctness of generated code. Solution might not be complete, you should use this code as an inspiration only.
Latta AI seeks to solve problems in open source projects as part of its mission to support developers around the world. Learn more about our mission at https://latta.ai/ourmission . If you no longer want Latta AI to attempt solving issues on your repository, you can block this account.
In some crates like emath, we can see what some small functions are
#[inline]
and some#[inline(always)]
. Why we cant make all small functions#[inline(always)]
?? In some places in code#[inline(always)]
may be better what#[inline]
. Can anyone make big code review for all crates and specify inline correctly, or tell why in some places where one line of code we use#[inline]
instead of#[inline(always)]
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: