Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A better way to manage workflow files #6170

Open
K-O-N-B opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

A better way to manage workflow files #6170

K-O-N-B opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Feature A new feature to add to ComfyUI. Frontend Issue relates to the frontend UI (litegraph).

Comments

@K-O-N-B
Copy link

K-O-N-B commented Dec 23, 2024

Feature Idea

Files can be managed by creating new directories, can be synchronized to the cloud or local backup directories, and can have version management

Existing Solutions

No response

Other

No response

@K-O-N-B K-O-N-B added the Feature A new feature to add to ComfyUI. label Dec 23, 2024
@t00350320
Copy link

You are right. I thought there already has a plugin can show history workflow files.
For comfyui , it may focus on runtime workflows. For many files and offline workflows, it may be a topic about a comfyui server scope. Please correct me if i am fault.
For my case, comfyui is deployed as a backend server ,then many workflow file names are configured in a yaml.
api request will be handled according different workflow key tag.

@LukeG89
Copy link

LukeG89 commented Dec 23, 2024

@K-O-N-B You need to open this feature request in the official frontend repo: https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend

Btw, I've also opened a request to improve workflow management:

@ltdrdata ltdrdata added the Frontend Issue relates to the frontend UI (litegraph). label Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature A new feature to add to ComfyUI. Frontend Issue relates to the frontend UI (litegraph).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants