Denoise SD3.5, Flux vs SDXL #5833
Creative-comfyUI
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
It is likely due to the difference in model capabilities. Previous generations of models used a mechanism where they wandered through the noise space during the denoising process, gradually arriving at the final result. In contrast, recent models employ a technique that denoises with a direct and straightforward directional approach, avoiding unnecessary wandering. The advantage of this is that it produces more accurate results, while the drawback could be seen as generating outcomes that lack creativity. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It seems that since the arrival of FLUX and SD3.5, Denoise has much less influence or none at all. Is it because SD3.5 and Flux no longer use UNET?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions