You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for your attention!
Your testing on R_Precision is a bit lower, 0.756 (your testing) v.s. 0.772 (Tab.1 in Paper). However, it seems your FID is even better, 0.468(your testing) v.s. 0.473(Tab.1 in Paper). Yet, I believe your testing is quite close.
BTW, the FID of this model "1222_mld_humanml3d_FID041.ckpt" should be 0.41, like the name. The mean/std files could cause this downgrade. Please pay attention to the following:
If your demo results have a severe issue on foot sliding, please take a look to the below. It could happen when ``self.feats2joints`` (use mean and std for de-normalization) is broken.
Thanks a lot for the great work. I test the trained model "1222_mld_humanml3d_FID041.ckpt"
The performance is as follows, which seems a bit lower than the reported performance in the paper.
Is the performance correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: