Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] 增加对openrouter的支持 #5963

Open
LiMinghan1220 opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[Feature Request] 增加对openrouter的支持 #5963

LiMinghan1220 opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@LiMinghan1220
Copy link

🥰 需求描述

如题,openrouter是著名的服务提供商,对它的支持可以几乎覆盖所有模型而不需要单独适配,这也是我这段时间的思考结果(我之前提过一个自定义模型的issues)。

🧐 解决方案

如题

📝 补充信息

No response

@LiMinghan1220 LiMinghan1220 added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 21, 2024
@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.


Title: [Feature Request] Add support for openrouter

🥰 Description of requirements

As mentioned, openrouter is a well-known service provider, and its support can cover almost all models without the need for separate adaptation. This is also the result of my thinking during this period (I mentioned a custom model issue before).

🧐 Solution

As title

📝 Supplementary information

No response

@QAbot-zh
Copy link

openRouter 复用 OpenAI 类型不是就可以了?

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.


Isn’t it enough for openRouter to reuse OpenAI types?

@LiMinghan1220
Copy link
Author

openRouter 复用 OpenAI 类型不是就可以了?

OpenAI我们需要接OpenAI😭

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.


Isn’t it enough for openRouter to reuse OpenAI types?

OpenAI we need to pick up OpenAI😭

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants